<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Hubdub Blog - Latest Comments in General</title><link>http://hubdub.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:06:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why is Digg.com so Anal about Sex?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/28/why-is-diggcom-so-anal-about-sex/#comment-1910715</link><description>It had NIPPLES, man! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you haven't forgotten, America is half creationist, bible-thumping conservative. UK, ah...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DWS Celebrity</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is Digg.com so Anal about Sex?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/28/why-is-diggcom-so-anal-about-sex/#comment-1908779</link><description>I know how you feel, we had 3 sex related items reach the front page and after the third on our site was banned.  This one post was our biggest : &lt;a href="http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Top_10_Orgasmic_Positions_for_Women"&gt;Top 10 Orgasmic Positions for Women&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DateExperience</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is Digg.com so Anal about Sex?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/28/why-is-diggcom-so-anal-about-sex/#comment-1907197</link><description>Funny somebody just forwarded this to me. You dirty birdy you shouldnt be posting stuff like that. I am a virgin and i just saw a noodie pic for the first time... scary</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louie Baur</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:02:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is Digg.com so Anal about Sex?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/28/why-is-diggcom-so-anal-about-sex/#comment-1897402</link><description>Try Reddit instead! They've got a NSFW section and a better discussion system.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vemrion</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is Digg.com so Anal about Sex?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/28/why-is-diggcom-so-anal-about-sex/#comment-1896301</link><description>I feel ya man, bummer about that. Digg is an interesting beast. Are you sure the demographic isn't 15 year olds? I wonder sometimes...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">40oz Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Olympics Mini-Highlights: Etcetera</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/07/2008-olympics-mini-highlights-etcetera/#comment-1685839</link><description>That is an interesting alternative way of viewing the data. The analogy we have used is stock prices which obviously aren't upward limited. Explaining the forecasts in a really simple way is a real challenge. One to think about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nigelecccles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch Guest Post - How to compete in the US without leaving blighty</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/18/techcrunch-guest-post-how-to-compete-in-the-us-without-leaving-blighty/#comment-1601991</link><description>Good outreach Nigel!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warrickt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Olympics Mini-Highlights: Etcetera</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/07/2008-olympics-mini-highlights-etcetera/#comment-1404507</link><description>A cross-section of any of these graphs shows the % breakdown of all contenders for victory in the stated Olympic event, as estimated by the market.  I'm assuming the probabilities of all listed contenders add up to 100% at any given moment: so, it seems to me that these graphs would be a lot easier to read if the vertical axis were split into coloured chunks (instead of lines) representing the teams, which would get thicker and thinner as their projected fortunes changed.  My apologies if that's a viewing option you already have.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart Candy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Olympics Mini-Preview: Swimming</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/05/2008-olympics-mini-preview-swimming/#comment-1138423</link><description>Seems like pretty high odds for Torres to win 2 medals.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Olympics Mini-Preview: Track and Field</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/03/2008-olympics-mini-preview-track-and-field/#comment-1091797</link><description>I hope so too, but historically its not looking good... As long as the stars (Lagat, Gay, Bolt, Powell, Warnier, etc) stay clean I think the fans will keep watching though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenni</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:03:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Olympics Mini-Preview: Track and Field</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/03/2008-olympics-mini-preview-track-and-field/#comment-1087158</link><description>Great post Jenni.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 100m is going to be a amazing race this year. What I keep wondering is if track and field can manage to keep doping out of the headlines this year. I really hope so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nigelecccles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Its 8 days until the Beijing Olympics! Are you ready?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/08/01/its-8-days-until-the-beijing-olympics-are-you-ready/#comment-1070395</link><description>Excellent recap of a myriad of issues surrounding the Olympics!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub quoted on Al-Jazeera</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/28/hubdub-quoted-on-al-jazeera/#comment-1023491</link><description>Also thanks to all users who play Hubdub - it's only through you playing the site that we generate forecasts worth quoting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do users find website changes?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/24/how-do-users-find-website-changes/#comment-1018192</link><description>Thanks! Now fixed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nigelecccles</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do users find website changes?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/24/how-do-users-find-website-changes/#comment-1016402</link><description>You linked to &lt;a href="http://propellor.com"&gt;propellor.com&lt;/a&gt; instead of &lt;a href="http://propeller.com"&gt;propeller.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kida</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:58:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do users find website changes?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/24/how-do-users-find-website-changes/#comment-987961</link><description>great write up, very interesting post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:54:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub - The Vision Thing</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/23/hubdub-the-vision-thing/#comment-986480</link><description>When they do that, they'll really be turning the web2.0 world upside down.  I would love to be able to tie all of my comments across various blogs into a comprehensive "reputation".  That would really help dig out knowledgable signal out of the typical blog noise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jedc_mercury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:47:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub - The Vision Thing</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/23/hubdub-the-vision-thing/#comment-982857</link><description>Thanks Jed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW Disqus is great. When they release their API we are keen to integrate them with our on-site comments as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nigelecccles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub - The Vision Thing</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/07/23/hubdub-the-vision-thing/#comment-982612</link><description>Great post, Nigel.  I think you're really nailing one of the ideas (#3 New news) that Paul Graham talks about here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ycombinator.com/ideas.html"&gt;http://ycombinator.com/ideas.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was quite skeptical about user-generated markets when you first started, but you and the team have really made them work.  That's what makes the site a real community and Hubdub so exciting!  Best of luck in making your vision happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(It's nice to see Disqus comments here, BTW.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jedc_mercury</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avril Lavigne&amp;#8217;s Girlfriend - Really (Really) Annoying (Annoying) Song to get Highest Hits on YouTube?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/27/avril-lavignes-girlfriend-really-really-annoying-annoying-song-to-get-highest-hits-on-youtube/#comment-885986</link><description>Look this video! There is Avril Lavigne!! I think she looks pretty!! &lt;a href="http://memopal.clickmeter.com/007042.html"&gt;http://memopal.clickmeter.com/007042.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funny16</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avril Lavigne&amp;#8217;s Girlfriend - Really (Really) Annoying (Annoying) Song to get Highest Hits on YouTube?</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/27/avril-lavignes-girlfriend-really-really-annoying-annoying-song-to-get-highest-hits-on-youtube/#comment-885983</link><description>Look this video! There is Avril Lavigne!! I think she looks pretty!! &lt;a href="http://memopal.clickmeter.com/007042.html"&gt;http://memopal.clickmeter.com/007042.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funny16</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today Is Firefox Download Day!</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/17/today-is-firefox-download-day/#comment-703306</link><description>Love it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:39:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Obama finally broke free of Clinton and McCain</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/02/how-obama-finally-broke-free-of-clinton-and-mccain/#comment-633281</link><description>Ryan,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your note, it sounds like we're of a similar opinion here, that the battle is only now ramping up and will become more vigorous, should be interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">valornhonor</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:29:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Obama finally broke free of Clinton and McCain</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/02/how-obama-finally-broke-free-of-clinton-and-mccain/#comment-632089</link><description>I think the only way to get back to the blog is to go to &lt;a href="http://blog.hubdub.com"&gt;blog.hubdub.com&lt;/a&gt; I don't think we have a link to the blog on the main page. My avatar is just really a joke,  I love politics but sometimes it just gets on my nerves! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sample on Hubdub is very small and is I'd imagine full of more lefties than righties. The internet always seems to attract more liberals than conservatives. For example you have sites like redstate and then you have the juggernaut Huffington Post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is that users on Hubdub whatever their biases are usually in it to win it. So if it looked likely that McCain was gonna get elected the market would shift his way. There is a incentive to bet correctly, H$ and right now it seems Obama has the advantage and the markets are showcasing it. When your're polled you don't have any real incentives to be right. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan&lt;br&gt;Hubdub Category Editor</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RyanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Obama finally broke free of Clinton and McCain</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/06/02/how-obama-finally-broke-free-of-clinton-and-mccain/#comment-631988</link><description>Hi Adam,&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;The "merciless attack" I'm expecting to come won't be a direct salvo from McCain but from the 527's although McCain may not endorse their actions I believe that he will benefit from their actions. And as of yet I haven't really seen high intensity 527 attacks on Obama, or vice versa. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will be harder for very negative campaigning to work this year. If you've watched Obama's speeches he always states how McCain is a "All American Hero," and when you watch McCain's speeches he gives Obama credit for being the first African American candidate. They can't attack each other really negatively because your going to have everyone taking everything out of context. So there will be a reliance on third party negative attacks that aren't officially attached to either campaigns.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking at the graph it still seems that McCain's price is slowly decreasing just not at a high rate. But, besides this Obama's now flattening out. From this I can possibly predict that McCain's slow downturn will level off as Obama's upturn levels off. The market won't really tighten but it may stay near the same levels. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the tightening of the market really depends on when McCain and Obama start getting gritty. It's not something I can give a description of, but I think we'll know it when we see it. Right now, although were in the general election it looks like both candidates aren't fighting each other a much as they are fighting for Clinton supporters. Once that's subsided I imagine the markets will tighten up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ryan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RyanJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>