<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Hubdub Blog - Latest Comments in Hubdub&amp;#8217;s Electoral College Forecast Spot On!</title><link>http://hubdub.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://hubdub.disqus.com/hubdub8217s_electoral_college_forecast_spot_on/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:39:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hubdub&amp;#8217;s Electoral College Forecast Spot On!</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/11/05/hubdubs-electoral-college-forecast-spot-on/#comment-3628640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, Hubdub is actually off by one. The Omaha, Nebraska vote has been called by many news organizations for Obama.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This more completely invalidates Hubdub's claim, even more so than the fact that Hubdub called two states incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, it raises the question as to whether the nebraska prediction page should have it's results invalidated, as the question allowed no answer for "split" in Nebraska.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Measure</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:39:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub&amp;#8217;s Electoral College Forecast Spot On!</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/11/05/hubdubs-electoral-college-forecast-spot-on/#comment-3604659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations to Hubdub on getting the number right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was, however, the result of a fluke in Hubdub getting predictions on two states wrong -- both with exactly 11 electoral votes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Hubdub says, "Hubdub's Election Map was based on 51 underlying prediction markets where users traded predictions in real-time on who would win each state."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hubdub incorrectly predicted Indiana would go to McCain (63% - 37%) and that Missouri (incorrectly) would go to Obama (60% to 40%). The result was that Obama reached the "correct" number 364 of electoral votes by adding the incorrect predictions of Missouri to the electoral college "total".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, accurately predicting 49 of 51 markets is nothing to sneeze at -- even though it may not, really, be "spot on".&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pundit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub&amp;#8217;s Electoral College Forecast Spot On!</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/11/05/hubdubs-electoral-college-forecast-spot-on/#comment-3589525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone's smarter than Karl Rove :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I joke, he's a smart guy just sometimes a bit of an annoyance!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubdub&amp;#8217;s Electoral College Forecast Spot On!</title><link>http://blog.hubdub.com/2008/11/05/hubdubs-electoral-college-forecast-spot-on/#comment-3578906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, hubdub is smarter than Karl Rove basically?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>